Welcome to Muppet Wiki!
(new) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We've said that audio evidence counts as a source if there's a consensus, but you seem to have trouble with that (in this case, bringing up an entirely random theory). It feels like the best way for you to contribute is to just stay away from that area entirely and find something else to work on. Because otherwise you've proved rather uncooperative (and in this case, choosing to revert multiple times even after an explanation rather than open a discussion) and this seems to be your biggest sore spot. |
We've said that audio evidence counts as a source if there's a consensus, but you seem to have trouble with that (in this case, bringing up an entirely random theory). It feels like the best way for you to contribute is to just stay away from that area entirely and find something else to work on. Because otherwise you've proved rather uncooperative (and in this case, choosing to revert multiple times even after an explanation rather than open a discussion) and this seems to be your biggest sore spot. |
||
| − | Is there another area you're really interested in? Find something constructive to do (and again, if you really disagree with anything, *ask* in a discussion first, and never undo again after an explanation; that's why [[Cluckitis]] was protected, because you keep returning to your original changes regardless of what the admins tell you). |
+ | Is there another area you're really interested in? Find something constructive to do (and again, if you really disagree with anything, *ask* in a discussion first, and never undo again after an explanation; that's why [[Cluckitis]] was protected, because you keep returning to your original changes regardless of what the admins tell you). Frankly, edit warring of that kind isn't tolerated even if it isn't an administrator, but most of your behavior has involved them. |
| + | |||
| + | There's lots of gaps still on the Wiki. I suggest finding something you're enthusiastic about and *add* information (and not theories ala Roger Miller) instead of taking things out. Thanks! |
||
Latest revision as of 03:07, 18 July 2014
We've said that audio evidence counts as a source if there's a consensus, but you seem to have trouble with that (in this case, bringing up an entirely random theory). It feels like the best way for you to contribute is to just stay away from that area entirely and find something else to work on. Because otherwise you've proved rather uncooperative (and in this case, choosing to revert multiple times even after an explanation rather than open a discussion) and this seems to be your biggest sore spot.
Is there another area you're really interested in? Find something constructive to do (and again, if you really disagree with anything, *ask* in a discussion first, and never undo again after an explanation; that's why Cluckitis was protected, because you keep returning to your original changes regardless of what the admins tell you). Frankly, edit warring of that kind isn't tolerated even if it isn't an administrator, but most of your behavior has involved them.
There's lots of gaps still on the Wiki. I suggest finding something you're enthusiastic about and *add* information (and not theories ala Roger Miller) instead of taking things out. Thanks!