His eyes are blue?Edit

For the second picture, CLamanatha added the sentence: "His eyes are blue." Is this true? -- Danny (talk) 02:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Orange Oscar picEdit

Fuzzyface32 changed the first picture on this page. I feel like the picture that was there made the distinction between the first two pictures clearer. What do other people think? -- Danny (talk) 12:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

The first one is more clear. The second image sucks color wise, it's to bright and Oscar blend in with the background to much. Henrik 13:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Oscar's orange years?Edit

An unregistered poster changed the second picture, and added the decription. But was the second season the point where Oscar turned green, or did it take longer than that? --Andrew, Aleal 00:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure the exact point the orange/green change was made...but I just added some more pictures to the listing. -- BradFraggle 00:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

The first season was the only one where Oscar was orange. The first appearance of the green Oscar was in the first episode of The Flip Wilson Show, which was before the second season (and sadly, it's cut in syndication). --Minor muppetz 01:20, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

I just added to the trivia section on the main Oscar page stating that Oscar's eyebrow has been the same since he was orange. But, in this section, you say the eyebrow changed once and has been the same since the second green Oscar. The Flip Wilson picture does appear to be a different eyebrow for the Grouch, but the orange Oscar looks like the same eyebrow as the second green Oscar. Anyway, the only reason I bring this up is because Caroll Spinney's book says: "... to this day Oscar still has the eyebrows from the original orange Oscar." I'm sure it's possible Caroll was mistaken, but the Through the Years article is still mis-quoted, saying the book says it was the same as from the second green version. I'm temporarily leaving my addition to the trivia section, but if one of you thinks it should be removed, that's fine, too. --Gribbaziggy 03:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)