Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
TALK PAGES ARE NO LONGER USED
To discuss article changes, please use:
- I'd be for it so long as we also kept the list. Such lists are always more interesting than categories since you can doll em up with pictures, add comments and group them together. — Scott (talk) 16:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. As long as it doesn't means losing the list, since then one can' distinguish aristocracy from royalty. Plus I like the "Real World Nobility" (I still need to add John Standing, a baronet), but I'm not sure they should really go in a category. Plus, I've got a nifty picture from The Muppets Make Puppets of the kitchen utensil royal family which I keep meaning to add. Also, I've linked quite a few pages to this list, and to specific sections sometimes, so I wouldn't want that to be lost either. -- Andrew Leal (talk) 16:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- I just added the image I talked about, with six royals. Plus, there's Ernie as king or Elmo as "Lord Elmo" and so on, and that would be lost too. If a category seems useful as well, that's fine with me, but I'm strongly opposed to getting rid of the list. -- Andrew Leal (talk) 17:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Should Counts Count?
Technically, Count von Count and any dukes, marquesses, baronets, Squire Trelawney, etcetera are aristocracy and not royalty. Or should we go ahead and stick all "titled folks" (in the traditional sense) on this page for convenience? --Andrew, Aleal 04:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oh! Never mind then. I only added the Count just now; take him off if you think he doesn't fit. I don't actually know anything about this kind of stuff. "They call me the Count because I love to count things! ...Also, I inherited my father's royal title." --GrantHarding 04:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm, when specifically did they use the "royal title" line? I know sometimes aristocracy and royalty are lumped in together, especially in fairy tales, since the aristocracy are usually part of the royal court and prime ministers etc. in fairy tales are usually dukes, but then knights are also title holders and aristocracy. Maybe I just chose the wrong night to tidy up this list. --Andrew, Aleal 04:34, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- What about using the term Nobility and including them all? -- Scott Scarecroe 19:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- That I can get behind! --Andrew, Aleal 19:53, 12 April 2006 (UTC)