Actually, those two are different (Whatnot) puppets. They just have the same voice. Do we need this? After all, there's been a lot more one-appearance hillbilly singers through the run of the show... -- Jog 11:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Also, I don't think that they're Full-Bodied Muppets. The one with Candice Bergen certainly never stands up. -- Peter (talk) 18:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

They're not Full-Bodied Muppets in the sense of the category, but they are special in that the hand puppet is attached to a full-sized body. Don't know how that helps, but I thought I'd throw it out there. -- Erik (talk) 23:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

The Muppet Morsels on the Candice Bergen episode specifically says that despite looking like one, it is not a full-body Muppet. Jim was crouched down under the chair operating it like a puppet. There was no guy in a suit or anything like that. I'm not sure about the other one, but I think it was the same kind of thing. -- Brad D. (talk) 23:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I say it's no different than when you can see Kermit's legs. Only this time, they're really long legs. If the puppet isn't a suit with a person inside, it's not a Full-Bodied Muppet. -- Peter (talk) 04:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

I agree. There's a difference between a Full-Bodied Muppet and "Muppets With Lower Limbs." Andrew Leal (talk) 04:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)