TALK PAGES ARE NO LONGER USED
To discuss article changes, please use:
If you see comments on this page, they remain for archive purposes.
NEWLY ADDED COMMENTS WILL BE REMOVED
Can we move the Nelvana description back to the bottom, or get rid of it entirely? It's not really accurate (it only describes the final season format), and I admit, I kind of hate the advertising spiel ("hot diggety dog"?), and don't like that being used to introduce the series. The subsequent sections describe the show in more detail, more accurately, and without the promotional sound. -- Andrew Leal (talk) 19:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think we can loose it all together. Originally it was added to the page (like many official blurbs or bios) as an easy solution and place holder to describe the subject. The article has since been bulked up enough that we don't need to rely on it to describe anything. Plus it's not really all that informative - it basically just mirrors the other information we have better documented here, but with an advertisey tone and no real details. I think we can cut it now without losing anything. -- Brad D. (talk) 19:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, theres no reason to have it on the page. Henrik 20:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Right now, a link to Dog City redirects to Dog City (special), and not Dog City (series). I think it makes more sense that the series gets the main redirect, especially since the Dog City category is all about the series. Does anyone object to me moving the redirect to the series? Or should it go to a disambiguation page? -- Danny Toughpigs 22:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC)