Muppet Wiki:Quality article nominations
From Muppet Wiki
A quality article should exemplify Muppet Wiki's very best work. Quality status is given based on merit, as determined by the Muppet Wiki contributors.
Contents |
Nominees
Mickey Mouse
- Nominate: A study of how the mouse and the frog have interacted and relate to each other, and where they intersect, with some choice images. One of the best pages we have right now for a celebrity, cartoon character, and point of reference. -- Andrew Leal (talk) 09:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support: A agree with everything the nominator said. --Minor muppetz 15:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support: I agree also. It is a great article on this great cartoon character. --Rocket Stevo 18:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support: I'm quite proud of our work on this one. A fun, informative and extensive list of Mickey's relationship with the Muppets. —Scott (talk) 04:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Monsterpiece Theater
- Nominate: I thought this page is quality since this page has all the pictures of all the known sketches and the description of each sketch is written well. Its quality is almost similar to Sesame Street News Flash, but for this one, we have all the pictures of all the Monsterpiece sketches that we know and I think it was a hard work page that most of the people on the Wikia helped contribute together on. Anyone agrees or disagrees? -- Rocket Stevo 04:16, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment and Support: Great idea! Good thinking. Should we just wait until we upload Seasons 15-32! Webkinz Mania 16:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support: I agree. And they all also say what the sketch titles are based on. --Minor muppetz 19:13, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support: Ditto. Thorough and informative -- Andrew Leal (talk) 09:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Procedure
Nominations
- Check the quality article criteria and ensure that the article meets all of them before nominating.
- Place ===[[name of nominated article]]=== under the nomination heading here.
- Below this title, write your reason for nominating the article and sign with ~~~~.
Casting votes
- To support a nomination, write *'''Support:''' followed by your reasons.
- To oppose a nomination, write *'''Oppose:''' followed by your reasons.
- To comment on a nomination without voting, write *'''Comment:''' followed by your comment.
- Your vote can be changed at any time. If you change your vote, don't delete the old vote -- that comment is an important part of the discussion. Instead, put a line through the old vote by adding <strike> and </strike> around the previous comment.
Awarding Quality status
- A decision is made two weeks from the day that an article is nominated.
- An article with at least 3 supporting votes (not counting the nomination) and no opposing votes gets Quality status.
- An article with 2 supporting votes remains on the list for another week. If the article doesn't earn 3 supporting votes by the end of three weeks, it's removed from the nomination slate.
- An article with 0-1 supporting votes after two weeks is removed from the nomination slate.
- One opposing vote can "veto" a nomination. There are two ways to deal with an opposing vote. If the article is improved enough to satisfy the person who cast the opposing vote, then it can be removed. If the opposing vote is based on unrealistic or unreasonable criteria, then three supporters can vote to "overturn" the veto. An article with an opposing vote can't be given Quality status until one of those conditions is met.